Country Risk Laboratory
LOWAn attack is highly unlikely.Reviewed October 2026
Zambia: Geopolitical Risk Assessment
A stable democracy facing debt strain and drought-driven power cuts.
Analyst assessment from public sources, written for practitioners. Threat levels describe the general environment for a civilian organisation; they are not a substitute for an organisation's own assessment of its own exposure.
Operating environment
- Staff in Lusaka and the Copperbelt.
Threats
- Crime in Lusaka and the Copperbelt.
- Load-shedding from low hydropower output.
- Political tension around elections.
Vulnerabilities
- Movement planned on habit rather than a current route assessment, with no written abort criteria for travel outside Zambia's main urban centres.
- Premises, accommodation and meeting venues chosen for convenience, with limited stand-off, access control or a second exit.
- Single communications channel and check-in intervals long enough that a missing team would go unnoticed for hours.
- Local partners and drivers engaged without a shared security standard or a briefing on current threat indicators.
Operational considerations
- Route and movement approval tied to a current written assessment, with defined no-go areas and abort criteria.
- Hibernation, relocation and evacuation plans tested at least once a year, with trigger points agreed in advance.
- Redundant communications (mobile, satellite, radio where licensed) and short, monitored check-in schedules.
- Pre-deployment briefings that cover the current threat picture, local law and cultural sensitivities.
- Basic briefings.
- Backup power.
Country context
Structured operating picture
Security environment
- Crime in Lusaka and the Copperbelt.
- Load-shedding from low hydropower output.
- Political tension around elections.
Political environment
- Staff in Lusaka and the Copperbelt.
Armed actors
- Crime in Lusaka and the Copperbelt.
- Load-shedding from low hydropower output.
- Political tension around elections.
Conflict dynamics
- Staff in Lusaka and the Copperbelt.
Humanitarian conditions
- Injury, detention or loss of life to staff, with lasting duty-of-care, family-liaison and legal obligations.
- Suspension of programmes or operations and loss of access that can take months to rebuild.
- Reputational and relationship damage with authorities, communities and partners if an incident is handled poorly.
Crime and personal security
- Movement planned on habit rather than a current route assessment, with no written abort criteria for travel outside Zambia's main urban centres.
- Premises, accommodation and meeting venues chosen for convenience, with limited stand-off, access control or a second exit.
- Single communications channel and check-in intervals long enough that a missing team would go unnoticed for hours.
Maritime exposure
- No direct maritime exposure; second-order supply and corridor effects remain relevant.
Infrastructure and access
- Route and movement approval tied to a current written assessment, with defined no-go areas and abort criteria.
- Hibernation, relocation and evacuation plans tested at least once a year, with trigger points agreed in advance.
- Redundant communications (mobile, satellite, radio where licensed) and short, monitored check-in schedules.
Regional exposure
- Staff in Lusaka and the Copperbelt.
Key drivers
See operating environment above.
Indicators
Review changes in threat, exposure and access.
Limitations
Open-source coverage varies and cannot establish every local condition.
If it happens
- Injury, detention or loss of life to staff, with lasting duty-of-care, family-liaison and legal obligations.
- Suspension of programmes or operations and loss of access that can take months to rebuild.
- Reputational and relationship damage with authorities, communities and partners if an incident is handled poorly.
Rated risks
| Ref | Risk | L | I | Rating | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZM-01 | Crime | 2 | 2 | LOW | Basic briefings. |
| ZM-02 | Power-cut disruption | 4 | 2 | MODERATE | Backup power. |
Residual risk
LOW.
Reliability & Confidence
Reliability: Usually reliable public sources; individual incident reports may be single-source. · Confidence: High, stable environment.
Sources
- · ACLED conflict event data
- · UN OCHA situation reports and ReliefWeb country pages
- · UN Security Council and panel-of-experts reporting
- · UK FCDO and US State Department travel advice
- · National and regional media monitoring
Other assessments
SomaliaEthiopiaSudanSouth SudanEritreaDjiboutiKenyaUgandaTanzaniaRwandaBurundiAlgeriaEgyptLibyaMoroccoTunisiaWestern SaharaBurkina FasoChadMaliMauritaniaNigerBeninCabo VerdeCôte d'IvoireGambiaGhanaGuineaGuinea-BissauLiberiaNigeriaSenegalSierra LeoneTogoAngolaCameroonCentral African RepublicCongoDR CongoEquatorial GuineaGabonSao Tome and PrincipeBotswanaEswatiniLesothoMalawiMozambiqueNamibiaSouth AfricaZimbabweComorosMadagascarMauritiusSeychelles